If school is all about the process of learning in order to help students grow and develop into meaningful global citizens, then isn’t it our job as their teachers and guides on their learning journeys to help support and challenge them in any way possible? So then, why do so many teachers refuse to retest or alternatively assess students? Some students, like me for example, are not good at taking tests. I get confused by the tricky multiple choice options and the short answer questions overwhelm me with the critical thinking involved on the spot. But, when I was in school, that was my only option for demonstrating my learning. How is that a process? If I did poorly on the test, I received a low grade and thus did not showcase my understanding of the content covered. Yet, I continued to matriculate onto the next grade each year. How? In retrospect, I wonder how effective my learning process was based on the teacher guides I had and grading systems with which I was faced.
Chapter 4 of Myron Dueck’s book entitled Grade Smarter Not Harder is all about the idea and philosophy around retesting or re-assessing students. Most traditional schools and educators take the low road and refuse to retest students. They view a test as a final game with no opportunity for a rematch. Is life like that? When my friend failed his driver’s education test, he was able to retake it a few weeks later and passed. When I was once late to a class because of a meeting, I wasn’t fired. I was given another chance to prove myself. So then, why do we not provide our students with second chances to demonstrate their learning? Dueck suggests just that in this chapter. Students should be allowed to retake a test, part of a test, or redo an assessment as long as the redo process is more rigorous than the first time through. Plus, the students need to somehow show that they have genuinely learned the concepts or skills involved. If a student did not showcase his understanding of rates and ratios on a math exam, he should have to attend study sessions, create vocabulary cards, or make and take his own self-created exam to prepare for a test redo or retake. This way, the students will really learn what they should have grasped the first time through. Sometimes, tests prove challenging for students and don’t really allow them to demonstrate their learning of the content because they were so caught up in the format of the test or section. Retesting allows for the teacher to change up the format of the test and questions, thus allowing students to demonstrate their true understanding of the concepts covered.
Some key points that Dueck brought up in Chapter 4 regarding retesting that I found intriguing…
- Rick Stiggins, an educator, preaches the idea that all students should be able to answer three questions throughout the learning process: Where am I going? Where am I now? How can I close the gap? This would be a great way to formatively assess students throughout a unit. How might I incorporate this into my class? I would have to reword the questions and use more student-friendly language. I would also have to help students understand how to know what the end result of a unit is. Using unit plans in the classroom might help the students see the entire process for each unit, and thus, allow them to know what the end result should look like for them. I want to keep this idea of reflection in mind as I plan my units for next year. I feel as though this process could be beneficial for my students.
- The author utilizes Tracking Sheets in his class for the students. When he hands back exams or projects, the students fill out a Tracking Sheet which lists the individual learning targets or graded objectives. The students then denote their progress and outcomes on the sheet. If they need to redo a section, they then explain what they will do to prepare before completing the re-testing phase. Great idea. This would help the students own their learning process. It would also be a great entrance ticket to a redo.
- Changing educational norms as they pertain to grading and assessment will require huge shifts in the culture of the school. So many students who come from families that have always had great access to education, generally tend to have been exposed to traditional sorts of teaching and grading. They feel as though this is how the game of school is played. Listen to a teacher provide you with information on a new skill, topic, or concept, study, take a test, and repeat. Getting students and families that come from this kind of world and society on board with objectives-based grading and assessment redos is no easy task. It will take many conversations for some students and their families to understand the hows and whys of the changes happening in the classroom. I dealt with a family like this during this past school year. They didn’t understand why we didn’t have numerous tests on a weekly basis. They also didn’t understand why we didn’t mark up student work with grades. They come from an educational background that is based in the industrialization of education: School is like a big factory where every student graduates having learned the same stuff in the same manner. That no longer works in our world. If we want students to be effective global citizens, they need to be creative problem solvers and innovators. Retesting is one way we can help bring about change in the classroom for our students.
- The only problematic idea Dueck brought up in this chapter pertained to how he grades retests. He blends or averages the scores together. This seems to go against the concept of grading just what the students should have learned: The graded objectives. Shouldn’t tests or assessments be graded on individual learning targets or objectives and not given an overall score? How would one flat score tell students how they are progressing regarding the individual learning targets covered for a unit? Tests or assessments should only be graded on the objectives covered. For example, if the students have to create a forest field guidebook that lists and describes various flora and fauna samples found in their assigned plot in the forest, the final product should only be graded on the two objectives covered throughout the unit: Identify accurately, by common name using a guidebook, various flora and fauna samples in Cardigan’s ecosystem and construct a diagram that describes and illustrates the cycling of matter and flow of energy among the living and nonliving parts of an ecosystem. The final projects should not be graded on neatness or organization if it is not a graded objective. Therefore, they are not going to earn an overall score on the project as it is all about the process of learning.
I hope that as a school we are able to have open discussions and conversations about our grading, homework, and testing policies throughout this next year. While I would love to have change come about right away and make all teachers utilize the objectives-based grading system, no longer grade or assess homework based on the letter grade, and allow for redos of tests and assessments, I know that I can’t expect monumental change in one year. I do hope that my school administrative team will help educate teachers to see the value in moving away from a traditional way of teaching and grading students so that change will happen within three to five years across the board at my school. Fingers crossed.